Okay, so, today I wanted to share a little brain teaser I’ve been working on: a crossword clue that says “ram in astrology.” I’ve been scratching my head over this one for a while, and I figured I’d take you all along on my journey to crack the code.
First off, I hit up my usual crossword solver sites, you know, the ones that give you a bunch of potential answers based on the letters you’ve got. I typed in “ram in astrology” and started scrolling through the results. Most of them were pointing towards a five-letter word. Hmm, interesting.
Then, I started digging a bit deeper. I found some forums and discussions where people were talking about this same clue. Turns out, it’s a pretty common one, and it pops up in different crossword puzzles, like the USA Today one, for example. That was a cool little tidbit to find out.
After looking through some crossword puzzle clues databases I noticed that there seems to be about 30-40 possible answers. But the most common answer kept coming up: ARIES. That made sense, right? Aries is the ram sign in the zodiac. I compared it to the “Other definitions for aries” and noticed that my answer “Ram star sign” was among them.
So, I decided to go with “ARIES” as my answer. I plugged it into my crossword, and guess what? It fit perfectly! That was such a satisfying feeling, let me tell you. All those other words I saw, like different names or phrases related to astrology or rams, they were just red herrings, I guess.
Anyway, I just wanted to share my little crossword adventure with you all. It’s always fun to conquer these word puzzles, and this one was a good reminder that sometimes the most obvious answer is the right one. You just gotta do a little digging and trust your gut. Keep on puzzling, folks!
- Input: Ram in astrology
- Output: Aries
Summary of Today’s Practice
In short, figuring out the answer to this clue was quite easy and interesting. The first thing to do was search for the answer on different crossword websites, and all of them seemed to agree on an answer. Then after doing some more digging, I finally figured out the correct answer.